This is one of those essays that shouldn’t have to be
written.
We all know that fish live in water. We know that fish breathe the oxygen
dissolved in that water, and that with the exception of a handful of species typically
native to still, hot, tropical rivers, fish are incapable of breathing air. But it doesn’t take more than a few seconds
of perusing folks’ social media accounts to find far too many anglers
forgetting that fact, as they hold their gasping, slowly dying catch in their hands and pose
in front of a lens.
While some species can tolerate that sort of handling,
particularly when air temperatures are fairly low, others are extremely
sensitive to any sort of handling. Even
relatively tolerant species become vulnerable when air temperatures rise.
Posing with a fish on a hot summer day is one of the best
ways to increase the release mortality rate.
“an initiative to help anglers create better outcomes for
each fish they release. For the month of
July, Keep Fish Wet and Ten and Two Co. challenge you to make a 31-day
commitment to not take a single photo of a fish.
“…Instead, we encourage you to post other artful shots of
your summer angling experience. This
simple shift in the angling community’s catch-and-release behavior could do
years of good for your fish’s home water.”
The Keep Fish Wet webpage tends to focus on trout, although
its message has wider application. It
states that
“In general, for every 10 degrees Celsius increase in water
temperature, a fish’s metabolic rate doubles.
This means that at warmer water temperatures, fish have a higher
metabolism and need more food. It also
means that at warmer water temperatures fish need more oxygen, a critical
component of the metabolic process.
However, remember that, all else being equal, warmer water holds less
oxygen than cooler water.
“As fish exercise, like on the end of a fishing line, their
metabolism increases, as does their need to bring more [dissolved oxygen] into
their bodies. If water temperatures are
high and [dissolved oxygen] is low, then fish need to work extra hard to
recover from angling stress, and in extreme cases, they perish.”
That statement is as true for striped bass and bluefish as
it is for trout and salmon.
“A profound effect on shallow hooking mortality [as
distinguished from deep “gut hooking,” which was the single most reliable
predictor of death] was documented in relation to air temperature. When air temperatures were below 95F, the mortality
of shallow hooked striped bass, those fish only stressed by physical exertion
not by lethal hook wounds, was 0.8%.
When air temperatures ranged from 95F to 105F in July, mortality rose to
17.2%. The mortality rate of all shallow
hooked fish combined was 3.5% for the entire study period.”
The Maryland study found that 95% of the bass that succumb
to release mortality do so within 24 hours after release. However, such death is generally not
immediate. Thus, as Keep Fish Wet notes,
“just because you watched the fish swim away does not mean it
will be fine.”
Escape response is easy to check. At the end of the fight, just reach over and grab
the fish by tail, right ahead of the fin.
If the fish responds, and struggles to get away, it is healthy and
likely to survive release. If it seems
indifferent to being restrained, it may not survive release.
Righting response is equally obvious. Fish typically swim with their backs toward
the surface of the water, and their bellies toward the bottom. Tired fish often slump over on their sides,
or even turn upside-down at the end of the fight. If an upside-down fish can’t right itself
within five seconds, it is a strong candidate for release mortality.
Regular ventilation merely means that a fish is opening and
closing its gills at regular intervals.
If a fish is incapable of doing that—effectively, if it is having
difficulty breathing—death probably isn’t too far away.
Eye tracking, the final criteria, is a little more difficult
to gauge. The fish must be placed in the
water, then rolled gently from side to side.
If its eyes remain level, and move to compensate for its body’s
movement, the fish is deemed to have a better chance of survival than it would
if the eyes just glassily stared out from their sockets, and showed no movement
at all. If the latter occurs, the fish
is very likely to die.
Fish that show positive escape or righting responses may be
safely released; those that fail both tests have substantially impaired chances
of survival. One
study suggests that bonefish which fail to show a strong righting response are
six times more likely to be attacked and killed by predators, probably within
20 minutes of release. Notably, the
study also found that
“Longer air exposure and overall handling times were
significant predictors of the loss of equilibrium in angled bonefish.”
Of course, longer air exposure and longer handling times are
exactly what results when fish are kept out of the water for photos, instead of
being quickly returned or, even better, released without removing them from the
water at all.
The next question that arises is what ought to be done with
fish that fail the righting response test.
Anglers
typically hold such fish beneath the water’s surface, trying to force water
over their gills by moving them back and forth, but it’s not clear that such
actions do very much good. Keep Fish
Wet suggests that any such fish, even if they
subsequently meet the regular ventilation and eye tracking standards, be held
in a net or live well until they recover enough to make survival likely.
While that may be possible for some species and some
anglers, it is extremely impractical for others. No matter how good their intentions, anglers
can’t legally toss an exhausted striped bass into their boat’s live well until
it begins to recover, if they already have a striped bass in the cooler; doing
so would constitute a violation of the 1-fish bag limit. For similar reasons, anglers can’t retain an
under- or over-slot bass, or a fish caught outside the season for legal
retention, without violating the law.
There are also physical limitations. While putting a fish in a live well sounds
good on paper, it assumes that the angler’s boat contains such a holding
device. Many don’t, either because the
boat is too small or because the boat came without that particular amenity. When I had my current boat built, I opted
against having a live well included, since I don’t normally liveline baits, and
had better use for the space that I live well would have occupied.
Shore-based anglers, under most circumstances, also lack
access to a live well, and so cannot use one to nurse exhausted fish
back to health prior to release.
The most practical option, then, is not to exhaust the fish
in the first place. Exhaustion attributed
to the fight can be minimized by using heavy tackle; exhaustion attributed to
the release is best avoided by releasing the fish in the water whenever
possible and, as the No Fish Dry July campaign suggests, by minimizing the
time fish spend out of the water by eschewing cameras and relying on memories
to record the experience.
Having said that, will I be completely abandoning my cameras
this summer?
Absolutely not. I’ll
continue to record the release of big fish—probably mostly sharks, but other
pelagic species can’t be wholly discounted—that are never removed from the
water, but are unhooked and set free while water flowed over their gills. And I’ll photograph fish such as dolphin
(mahi-mahi), black sea bass, and the occasional tuna, which are caught and
retained for food, making the release mortality issue irrelevant.
There is no reason why other folks shouldn't do the same.
But for fish intended for release, the no-photograph pledge
is a very, very good idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment