We all know that the cod situation up in the Gulf of Maine
has gotten pretty bad. With the
population down to just 3 or 4 percent of target levels, “stock collapse” is a
relevant term and it is even possible that a Newfoundland-like moratorium could
loom in the future.
Even so, it’s probably hard for folks with no connection to
New England to understand just how bad things are, and how far King Cod, which
once ruled both the recreational and commercial fisheries in the Gulf of Maine,
has fallen.
To put things in context, in order to keep some sort of
business flowing now that the recreational fishery for Gulf of Maine cod has
been completely closed, some of the region’s party boats are now targeting at
least one fish that is a candidate for listing under the federal Endangered
Species Act.
No, I’m not kidding.
In an
article that appeared in the May 25 edition of the Newburyport (MA) Daily News, Tom Orrell, owner of the
Gloucester, Massachusetts based Yankee Fleet of party boats, said
“We can’t fish for cod this season and there’s nothing we can
do about that right now. There’s just
been so much negative publicity, but what we’re trying to get across to folks
is that there are species we can fish for and that the experience of fishing
out on the North Atlantic and the experience of Gloucester and the experience
of getting some fish to take home are still there.”
And that’s all true.
But when it comes to those “species we can fish for,” the Daily News reporter goes on to explain
that
“In the place of cod, Orrell and other big boat operators are
trying to sell their customers on fishing for species such as haddock, pollock
and cusk.”
Haddock, I can understand, because that fish has recovered
pretty nicely and produced a few big year classes, although I can also
understand why a lot of fishermen might not think that bringing home just 3,
possibly sub-20-inch haddock isn’t worth the long trip offshore. And I can understand pollock, too, because
the last benchmark assessment said that they’re pretty abundant, even though
that optimistic assessment was based on a “cryptic biomass” that might not
really exist.
But it is hard to think of targeting cusk, which the National Marine
Fisheries Service’s Office of Protected Resources has considered a “Species of
Concern” for quite some time, and named as a candidate for listing under the
Endangered Species Act in 2007.
That’s a long time to linger on the candidate list, but the truth is
that there is just so little information out there about cusk that the actual
health of the stock is hard to determine.
Thus, they still can be fished, even though what little data
is out there makes the situation seem bad.
According to the Office of Protected Resources,
“A declining
population trend has been evident since the late 1960s. All abundance indices remained at or close to
record low levels from 1985 through 2002.
The NMFS Northeast Fisheries Science Center biomass index for cusk was
near zero in 1998 and is the record low.
In the early 1970s, individual fish weight averaged 7 lbs (3 kg) but
declined by 50% to 1.5 kg (3 lbs) through the late 1990s. Landings and survey indices have dropped
considerably from 1984 to 2004. The
ratio of landings to biomass estimates has been increasing since 1986, which
implies increased exploitation over time.
“The catch per unit effort from 1970-2001, or just over 3
cusk generations, declined by about 90% while population estimates for cusk
greater than 20 inches (0.5 m) in the same time frame demonstrated a 96%
decline…”
And this is a fish that is being promoted to anglers as a good alternative to cod, proving that
the recreational fishing industry up in New England is truly desperate…
The interesting thing is that, despite the precarious state
of the population, cusk are not currently managed by NMFS. There is no real directed fishery for
cusk. Although they are often taken as
bycatch in longline fisheries for various groundfish species, and occasionally
caught by recreational fishermen seeking
cod and similar species, the New England Fishery Management Council did not
choose to include them in the Northeast
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan.
Thus, they have no meaningful protection short of the Endangered Species
Act.
So in the absence of cod, New England fishermen are now
targeting other species, including some of dubious health, and others that we
know aren’t in good shape. We have to
wonder just how long the merry-go-round of fishing on depleted stocks can go
on.
Most of the cod are now gone, and flounder stocks are not
healthy. Wolffish and ocean pout may not
be retained, and what remains of the recreational fishery now depends on small
haddock, pollock of “cryptic” abundance and a few lesser species, including the
potentially threatened cusk.
Yet even
when faced with this reality, New
England fishermen tend to fight regulation rather than embracing the chance
to recover their fisheries offered by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Such stubbornness can only lead to a steadily worsening
situation.
If nothing changes, it is easy to foresee a time when all
stocks have fallen too far for fishing to continue, with not even threatened
species available to soak up some effort when once-popular stocks have
collapsed.
And should that occur, New England fishermen and the
industries they support may learn in the hardest way possible how bad desperation can be.
No comments:
Post a Comment