About a week ago, Andrew
Cuomo, the Governor of the State of New York, caught a shark.
It was a thresher, which weighed a little over 150
pounds. All things considered, it was
typical of the threshers that we’ve been seeing off Long Island over the past
few years.
A rebound in menhaden abundance has brought big schools of that important baitfish into our nearshore waters.
A rebound in menhaden abundance has brought big schools of that important baitfish into our nearshore waters.
Those menhaden, in turn, have
tolled in a host of predators ranging from bluefish to humpback whales. Thresher sharks, many of them about the same
size as the one caught by Governor Cuomo, frequently harry the menhaden schools.
Anglers regularly hook and land such threshers well within
sight of shore. Some of those threshers were
a lot bigger—maybe three times the size—of the one caught by the Governor. Some were a bit smaller. But most have been about the same size.
And because thresher sharks are a good-eating fish—many
anglers, including myself, think threshers taste as good or better than makos—quite
a few of those that are caught are brought home. Governor Cuomo decided to bring his shark
home, too.
A picture of the Governor posing with the shark appeared on
Twitter and in local newspapers, and that was when Andrew Cuomo experienced his
Cecil the
Lion moment. Newspapers
from as far away as England carried articles criticizing his catch, while many of the responses
to his Twitter post demonstrated that people are always ready to show an
excess of outrage about things that they know nothing about.
Locally, the award for worst headline should go to a New
York City publication called the Gothamist,
which announced that “Big
Man Andrew Cuomo Kills “Vulnerable” Large Animal For Sport.” The text that followed was worthy of the
headline, saying things such as
“Over the weekend, Governor Andrew Cuomo signaled to the
world that, whatever questions may exist about investigations into possible
self-dealing by his administration, the effectiveness of his signature
big-ticket projects, or his level of support for the Democratic Party, he has
balls made of solid brass.
“How? Why he killed a
154-pound thresher shark off the coast of the Hamptons…
“Still doubting Cuomo’s iron-like constitution and
unflinching bravery?...”
It’s the sort of thing that you’d expect to be written by a
Manhattanite encased in a tower of concrete and steel, whose closest approach
to the natural world comes when he finds a cockroach swimming in his
(gluten-free) cereal bowl.
It includes
all of the tropes typically included by urban dwellers who draw a sharp line
between “people” and “nature,” including the suggestion that people
hunt or, in this case, fish as a way to prove their manhood and courage, and
perhaps make up for other shortcomings.
It’s laughable, but we shouldn’t laugh too hard, because
such urban attitudes are infecting a population that is ever more divorced from
the natural world, and that has some real implications for the future of both
our sport and the natural world itself.
Far too many folks who don’t hunt and fish,
and don’t associate with people who do, just don’t understand why some of us engage in such activities. In their neat, stainless steel and
Styrofoam world, where meat—if they eat it at all—is packed atop absorbent pads
to help hide the fact that it ever held blood, the idea of killing a living
creature in order to dine on its flesh is not only incomprehensible but, in many of
their minds, abhorrent.
They know little or nothing about conservation
successes.
They have probably never
heard of duck stamps, the return of the wild turkey or the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
And, because they have never seen
themselves as a part of the ecosystem, and never interacted with the real world
as predator or, in extremely rare cases, as prey, they really don’t
understand how things work, or where the real problems lie.
Lewis
Pugh, the United Nations’ so-called “patron of the oceans” got into the act, describing Cuomo’s killing of the thresher shark as “abhorrent,” and saying that
“The environment is the primary issue on the global agenda,
so it is extraordinary that a senior political could be so ignorant about
it. Apex predators such as sharks are
crucial for the ocean ecosystems. For a
public figure to kill such an animal and then boast about it on social media is
dangerously irresponsible. This shows a
clear lack of judgment and calls to question his capability as a public leader.”
Of course, when you read that statements, you should
first understand that Mr. Pugh is neither a trained biologist nor has any experience
as a fishery manager; his
degrees are in politics and law, and he earned his fame by being a marathon
swimmer, who engages in stunts such as swimming across the North Pole to
publicize environmental issues.
Given that lack of training, it’s easier to understand why
Mr. Pugh might make a big fuss over Governor Cuomo killing a smallish
thresher shark, while saying nothing when the one company, Omega Protein, Inc.,
killed
about
300,000,000 pounds of Atlantic menhaden in 2014—even though those
menhaden are a critical part of the food web, an important prey species not
only for thresher sharks, but for just about every predatory fish on the east
coast.
Mr. Pugh is correct when he says that apex predators are important to marine
ecosystems, but without any prey, they
don’t have much of a purpose…
On the other hand, menhaden are small, not particularly impressive fish. And not that many people have heard of Omega
Protein. If you want to get the best
bang for your PR buck, you’re better off criticizing Governor Cuomo for killing
one shark, than you would have been
criticizing Omega for killing a few hundred million pounds of menhaden, even if
Omega’s actions do far more harm over all.
After all, sharks are charismatic,
and have fallen upon some rough times; that makes it easy to outrage the kind
of folks who get most of their information from internet memes. And the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature did call thresher sharks “vulnerable.”
Of course, none of the Governor’s critics took any time to
explain what “vulnerable” means. The IUCN ratings scale
places “vulnerable” somewhere in the middle; a “vulnerable” species is in worse
shape than one which is of “Least Concern” or “Threatened,” but in better shape
than those which are “Endangered,” “Critically Endangered” or “Extinct in the
Wild.”
To put that in context, the albacore tuna that Bumblebee
sells you in little white cans is “Near Threatened,” so in better condition
than threshers. On the other hand, the Atlantic bluefin tuna
that makes up the otoro at good sushi
bars is “Endangered,” and a little worse off.
No one has seen the Gothamist
trying to shut down any sushi bars lately; in fact, it
reviews and promotes them, even when they serve otoro...
Given that, Gothamist’s
criticism of the Governor’s thresher seems more than a bit hypocritical, and more
than a little bit lame.
I consider myself a conservationist, and I know a bit about
sharks. I’ve participated in the
National Marine Fisheries Service’s Cooperative Shark Tagging Program since the
late 1970s, helping to provide data about sharks migrations, growth rates,
harvest levels, etc. If I had caught
Governor Cuomo’s shark, I probably would have tagged it and let it go, as I’ve
released every other shark caught from my boat in the past 16 years.
But I just can’t fault the Governor for making a different
decision. Thresher sharks aren’t as
abundant as they used to be, but a recent NMFS study determined that, here inthe northwestern Atlantic, they’re neither threatened nor endangered. Taking the very occasional fish home for food
won’t make that change.
Now, if Governor Cuomo had killed a winter flounder, I might
have been far more upset. They
are arguably the most imperiled salt water fish in the state, and could easily
disappear forever.
But small, flat and brown is most definitely uncharismatic, and it’s pretty safe to say that neither Gothamist, Mr. Pugh nor all of the folks on Twitter would be particularly outraged had Governor Cuomo had tweeted about killing a flounder instead of a shark.
But small, flat and brown is most definitely uncharismatic, and it’s pretty safe to say that neither Gothamist, Mr. Pugh nor all of the folks on Twitter would be particularly outraged had Governor Cuomo had tweeted about killing a flounder instead of a shark.
Flounders are, after all, so plebian, while sharks are, well, big...
If the writers at Gothamist
heard that a flounder had died, they’d just look at each other and shrug.
And go back to eating their sushi.
No comments:
Post a Comment