Managing fish is a tough thing to do.
They live in an alien world that makes them hard to count
with any sort of accuracy. Countless
factors, many still unknown, affect their survival, their movements and their
spawning success.
Then there are the people who catch those fish, legally and
illegally. Some of their catch is easy
to count, particularly that portion attributable to the relatively small number
of commercial fishermen, who are generally required to report their harvest in
near real time. But the rest of the
catch, the part that’s caught by hundreds of thousands, and often millions, of
individual anglers who land only a few fish each, in countless ports scattered
along hundreds of miles of coast, can only be estimated.
And once you have some idea who those people are, you have
to design regulations that will keep
them from killing too many fish, without knowing exactly how many of them will
actually go fishing, how many times they will go or what they will fish for each
time they set out.
Add a species of fish with an unusual life history and
without a valid stock assessment, and what do you get?
If you manage fish in along the mid-Atlantic coast, you get
the black sea bass.
Next week, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council and
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission will meet in a joint session,
to propose regulations governing recreational black sea bass fishing in 2015.
It is likely to be a tense and difficult meeting.
In many ways, black sea bass represent a fisheries
management success story. The stock has
been fully recovered, and fishermen have been catching more and larger sea bass
than they have caught in a very long time.
That’s good.
But it’s also bad, because it leads to what Dick Brame, a
long-time fisheries advocate who works for the Coastal Conservation
Association, calls the “Bubba Effect.”
That is, a guy goes out and catches a bunch of fish, and
when he comes back from the trip, he tells his buddy Bubba all about it. So Bubba goes out and catches his own bunch
of fish, comes home and calls his
friends, and…
In the end, there are a lot more people chasing that kind of
fish, just because there are a lot of them around and word of good fishing got
out. Managers didn’t expect such an
increase in effort, catches soar far beyond what was expected and overfishing
occurs.
So the next year, the managers tighten up the regulations to
prevent overfishing from occurring again, and the anglers complain that there
are so many fish around that they can’t keep them off their hooks, yet the
managers are telling them to throw most of them back.
That’s pretty much what’s been happening with black sea bass
for the past couple of years, and it looks like it’s going to happen, perhaps
on an even larger scale, once again.
Black sea bass have become so abundant that party boats that once fished
only for fluke all summer long are now regularly scheduling sea bass trips in
June, July and August, and private boats are doing much the same thing.
I’ve fished for black sea bass for quite a few years, and often
had wrecks all to myself. Now, I’m just
about guaranteed to have company every time I go out, even when I fish on
wrecks that lie a long way from the inlet.
The effort shift from fluke to black sea bass is striking
and
real; it probably doesn’t help that a lot of anglers have learned that they
can have the best of both worlds if they drift their fluke baits close to the
wrecks that the sea bass call home.
The upshot is that, as a result of the black sea bass’
newfound popularity, the National Marine Fisheries Service has estimated that
anglers exceeded their Annual Catch Limit by nearly 30 percent in 2014. All of the overage can be attributed to high
landings levels in the states between Massachusetts and New Jersey.
So when the Council and ASMFC meet next week, they’re going
to be looking at some pretty restrictive regulations in order to get rid of
that overage. Right now, it appears that
regulations won’t change in federal waters or in state waters between Delaware
and North Carolina.
But in the states that contributed to the overage, the 2015
rules are going to hit pretty hard.
Right now, it’s not completely clear what those rules might be, but if
the states fail to put in needed reductions, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council’s Summer Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass Monitoring
Committee is recommending coastwide rules that include a 3-fish bag limit,
14-inch minimum size and a season that runs only from July 15 to September 15.
That’s harsh, but if it’s any solace, think how much worse
things would have been if the party boats had gotten their way last August, and
the Council had allowed them to fish for black sea bass in January and
February. Since the catch for that
special winter for-hire season was going to be deducted from what we could land
during the regular black sea bass season, the rest of us might not have had any
black sea bass season at all…
Even so, we can expect the party boats to howl when the new
regulations are proposed.
We can already imagine what the complaints will be as the for-hires,
their lawyers and the organizations that shill for the recreational fishing
industry attack the science, the scientists and federal fisheries laws, claim
that catch data is “fatally flawed” and, most particularly, ask why regulations
need to be so restrictive when, out on the water, black sea bass seem to be
everywhere.
The truth is, there really are a lot of black sea
bass out there.
More particularly, there are a lot of black sea bass from
the dominant 2011 year class out there, and those fish are going to be fully
recruited into the fishery in 2015.
Not too long ago, I spoke with a biologist who was a member
of the Monitoring Committee. We were
talking about black sea bass, and he told me that, in any year, the biggest
factor that determines whether a big year class will be produced isn’t the
initial spawning success, but rather whether water conditions out on the edge
of the continental shelf, where the young-of-the-year fish spend their first
winter, are conducive to the young fish’s survival.
In the warm winter of 2011-2012, conditions must have been
pretty good, because 2011 produced a dominant year class.
However, the Monitoring Committee report includes
the following language
“The Committee notes that the 2011 year class of black sea
bass is much larger than any other recent year class, and is contributing
significantly to high availability in the northern states. There has been no indication of high
recruitment after 2011, and the Committee expects the 2011 year class
to be fully recruited to the fishery by the spring of 2015. The Committee noted that this year class is currently
being fished down quickly, with
no similarly large year classes coming in behind it. [emphasis added]”
That leaves fishery managers impaled on the horns of a very
large dilemma once the complaints start coming in.
Managers could yield to the folks who seek to increase
short-term landings. They can approach
the Council’s Science and Statistics Committee, which sets the upper limit on
harvest, and ask the SSC to consider replacing its current “constant harvest”
management approach with something that will permit more of the 2011 year class
to be killed.
If the SSC agrees, 2015
regulations need not be as severe.
However, since the stock hasn’t produced a large year class
since 2011, killing more fish now will merely be putting off the pain for a few
years; if the 2011 year class is fished down, and no new year class comes in
from behind to replace it, harsh regulations are going to be imposed
anyway.
And, by that time, the 2011 year
class may be reduced so far that, even with strict regulation, the stock may
struggle a while before it can recover.
On the other hand, managers can opt to protect the future of
the fishery, and impose tough regulations today in the hope that there will
still be enough fish remaining to produce a strong new year class a few years
from now.
However, if managers take that
route, there’s no doubt that they will be subject to considerable vitriol by
those people and organizations that consider large current harvests more important
than the long-term health of fish populations.
It’s a no-win situation for fishery managers.
Someone will criticize them no matter what they decide.
But I suspect that criticism will be a lot easier to take if
they know in their hearts that they did the right thing, and guaranteed the
black sea bass’ future.
No comments:
Post a Comment