There’s just not enough fish, and in particular not enough
cod, in the ocean to keep the two sectors operating independently. So instead of remaining a separate sector,
the remaining half-dozen boats and 30 groundfish permits of Sector II will be rolled
up into Northeast Groundfish Sector II, which will remain a financially viable
entity that will include about 35 boats and 128 permits.
That’s bad news for a port that has been
part of the northeastern groundfish fishery since it was founded in 1623,
and bad news for northeastern groundfish in general, as it evidences a
continuing lack of fish that leaves both the future of the fishing industry,
and of the fish themselves, in considerable doubt.
Unfortunately, there has been a lot of bad news for New
England fisheries over the past few decades, and there is little reason to believe that the news is going to get better at any time soon.
As the history of Gloucester suggests, New England has
supported fisheries for cod and other groundfish since the first colonial
settlements were established on the Massachusetts coast. For many years, fishing was a major industry
in coastal towns, although as populations increased and technology advanced,
the fish started feeling the strain.
The Atlantic
halibut fishery was the first to collapse as a result of overfishing. Although it is a relatively young fishery, that didn't really get underway until the early 1800s, the halibut fishery reached its peak before the 20th
Century began, and had collapsed by the early 1940s.
That collapse relegated Atlantic halibut to mere “incidental” status in
the greater fishery for cod and other groundfish, which was successfully
prosecuted for a few decades more.
But the groundfish fishery started feeling real pain in the
1960s, as foreign factory ships plundered the fisheries off the U.S. East
Coast. As
reported in a 1976 article from the New
York Times,
“From the air, foreign ships could be seen today scattered
throughout the expanse of cobalt blue from north of here [off Ocean City, New
Jersey] to Cape May. Rusty-hulled trawlers,
nets out on cables, pitched gently in 4-foot-high waves and rolled with the
swells under gale force winds that flecked the ocean with whitecaps.
“Eight miles from shore, off Ocean City, the 100-foot trawler
Kanter tied up alongside the Polish factory ship Pomorze to unload
herring. Aboard the big “mother” or “factory”
ship, its yellow superstructure, gleaming in the sun, crews were at work
processing the catch. Fifteen miles out,
two dozen Eastern European fishing ships the size of the Kanter and larger
plied the cold waters, crewman on deck in orange parkas and hoods to break winds
that chilled the air to 10 below zero.
“About 30 miles offshore, trawling for mackerel, were scores
of Soviet ships, including processing factories up to 600 feet long and
refrigerated transportation ships nearly as large that would take the filleted,
frozen and packaged product back to Soviet ports…
“’Our own fishing industry can’t compete with that,’ said John
W. Brown of Ocean City, South Jersey regional director of the Emergency
Committee to Conserve America’s Marine Fisheries…’They are depleting the
supplies. Haddock is practically an
endangered species here already. Herring
is declining rapidly. Cod is seriously
jeopardized.’”
According to the Times, when that article was written, about 150 foreign vessels, including 97
from the Soviet Union, were fishing off the U.S. Atlantic Coast north of Cape
Hatteras, North Carolina, and were doing real harm to the local fish stocks.
So, later in the same year, at the insistence of American
fishermen, Congress passed the Fishery
Conservation and Management Act of 1976 which, after later amendments, became
what is now known as the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
New England groundfish weren’t exempt from that
process. In 1982, the
New England Fishery Management Council did away with annual quotas for cod and the
other fish stocks under its jurisdiction, claiming that the fishery would
self-regulate as it responded to changes in fish abundance.
There was little hard evidence to support such a
view. Between 1977,
when the new federal law was first implemented, and 1983, the number of New
England groundfish boats nearly doubled, from 825 to 1,423. It soon became obvious that the cod
population, along with populations of haddock and yellowtail flounder, were
still skidding downhill. But fishermen
still resisted regulation.
“as NMFS scientists warned of declining stocks of cod,
haddock, and yellowtail flounder, the council dithered. That changed only in 1991, when the NMFS was
sued by the Conservation Law Foundation.
Under court order, the council began drafting regulations…the goal being
to cut fishing effort and presumably fishing mortality in half. Fishermen protested: while the council system turns the henhouse over
to the foxes, it manages to leave most foxes feeling unrepresented…
“It’s come to the point now where unless you’re absolutely
blind you can’t pretend that the stock isn’t in very bad shape, because it’s
almost gone, says [Andy] Rosenberg [a NMFS biologist and spokesman]. And still people are arguing, ‘We don’t want
to have a direct control on how much we
catch.’”
Finally, Congress
ended up passing the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, which amended
Magnuson-Stevens, to require that overfishing be ended and that overfished
stocks be timely rebuilt. While the
1996 law did end council “dithering” in most places, it failed to make much of a
dent in New England, where the New England Fishery Management Council still
shunned hard-poundage quotas while favoring input controls such as trip limits
and restrictions on days at sea.
That didn’t work.
Overfishing still occurred, overfished stocks weren’t rebuilt., and most
groundfish stocks continued to decline.
In response, when
Congress reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens in the closing days of 2006, it included
provisions that required regional fishery management councils to set hard-poundage
catch limits for all managed stocks, and to hold fishermen accountable when
they exceeded those limits.
The
New England Council finally stopped its previously incessant fight against
regulation and, in 2010, adopted a catch
share program, which would assign a designated share of each stock to one or
more designated “sectors”—effectively, groups of fishermen who were united by
geography and/or their use of the same types of gear—based on their prior
reported landings, while setting some fish aside for “common pool” vessels
that opted out of the catch share program, and were still subject to
traditional quotas.
Fishermen who tried to skate around previous regulations—or tax
obligations—by failing to report all of their catch were disadvantaged, as well
as displeased, when such allocations were made.
But there were still problems.
Federal
investigators discovered that, in New Bedford, Massachusetts, Carlos Rafael,
who called himself the “Codfather” and dominated the port’s fishing fleet, had
been illegally harvesting overfished species and, with the help of cooperative crewmen
and unethical fish wholesalers, mislabeling them as other, less regulated fish. When the legal system was done, New
Bedford’s Northeast Groundfish Sector IX was barred from fishing until it repaid
the overage that Rafael’s boats had accrued, and put safeguards in place to prevent
further overfishing.
Usually,
any overharvest would be attributed to the boats who actually took too many
fish, but Rafael’s illegal schemes made that impossible, so 55 Rafael-owned boats
left Sector IX and joined Northeast Groundfish Sector VII, leaving just 3 boats
behind to be held accountable for the excess landings. At the same time, all of the boats that had previously
been in Sector VII, perhaps not wanting to be associated with any bad actors
from Sector IX, exited that sector, with 16 of them joining Northeast Groundfish
Sector VIII, where they might have a better chance of avoiding any legal
taint.
It’s hard to say what the result of all that moving around
was, although it’s probably safe to assume that it didn’t do the cod any good. Some people have argued that the catch share system didn’t end up doing the fishermen
any good, either, although such arguments tend to be made only by either
the fishermen themselves, or by one of their traditional advocates, rather than by unbiased observers.
Whatever the truth, it's undeniable that things have gotten
bad enough that the
entire recreational cod fishery has been shut down in the Gulf of Maine,
although it limps on elsewhere.
It is also undeniable New England once hosted a
vibrant and economically important groundfish fishery, and that such fishery
suffered from many years of overharvest.
And that fishermen, when confronted with the problem,
did their best to avoid any meaningful regulation for a very long time.
And that, in the end, after years of overfishing, it was many of the
fishermen themselves who disappeared.
The first domino to fall was the halibut fishery, that died before the Second World War.
After that, some fishermen succumbed to the damage done by
the foreign fleets—the only damage that was, for many years, beyond their
control. But after both the United
States and Canada pushed the foreign fleets off their shores in 1977, it was their domestic fishing fleets that expanded and overfished groundfish stocks. Off both nations, the cod populations declined;
the Canadian decline was so bad that, in 1992, the Newfoundland fishery was
completely closed.
So second domino fell.
And the thing about dominoes is that, when they start to
fall, it all begins slowly. The first hits the second, and the second knocks
the third piece down. But then, things seem
to speed up. And things certainly sped
up for groundfish.
The recreational cod fishery in the Gulf of Maine closed in
2018.
Now, only a few months into 2019, we’ve already witnessed Sector III’s
demise.
Five dominoes down.
How many to go?
It’s hard to say. The smart money is on many more.
For fishermen seem slow to learn that, in the long run, conservation doesn't hurt their businesses. It's the only way to keep them alive.
Right on the money Charles. Those fishermen are their own worst enemies. Too many fishermen, too few fish is a recipe for disaster.
ReplyDelete