I just learned that an
angler down in Louisiana put a 246.1 pound tarpon on the scales.
The fish, which may also be the largest
tarpon ever caught in the United States, eclipsed the previous, 22-year-old
state record of 230 pounds.
The successful angler and a friend, who was with him on the
water that day, are pictured in a local paper flashing “Number One” signs to
the camera as the photo was taken.
They’re standing on either side of the dead fish, which appears to be
hanging on a scale, and appear very pleased with what they accomplished that
day.
I’d have been very pleased with a fish like that, too—right
up to the time that somebody reached out and stuck a gaff in the thing.
After that, the whole day would seem like a waste.
Tarpon just
aren’t viewed as a food fish, and so there's absolutely no reason to kill them. Sure, like a lot of things that swim, walk or
fly, they can be eaten, and actually
are eaten in a few places where food’s hard to come by, but it’s pretty likely that after the photo session was
done, that record fish was hauled down off its rope, trucked off to a landfill
and left for the flies to enjoy.
Why not just let it go?
That’s what most tarpon fishermen do these days.
In Florida, you
need an expensive, hard-to-get permit to kill a tarpon. Even with the
permit, you’re allowed to kill just one fish per year, and only if that one is a
potential world record. The state
figured out that taking a bunch of big, inedible fish out of the water and killing them just for photos isn't nearly as good for the tourism business as keeping those fish alive in the water where the tourists can catch them again and again.
State
regulators in Louisiana haven’t figured that out yet, and let folks kill as
many tarpon, regardless of size, as they care to cart to a dumpster, bury
in the back yard or dump back out at sea.
And the fishermen apparently do kill their share.
The same article that announced the new
Louisiana record fish mentioned a “[l]egendary Louisiana tarpon angler” who
managed to kill fish of 219.5 and 228.81 pounds (and who knows how many others)
over the years. I followed a link in the
article to that
“legendary tarpon angler’s” website, and found more than enough photos of
tarpon hanging from scales or lying on the decks of
various boats, apparently expired.
And that seemed even more pointless. Even if I don’t like the idea of killing a
fish just for a state record, I can understand it; being top-of-the-heap in any
endeavor is a source of pride. But
killing a fish for nothing more than a photo and a few minutes of bragging back
at the bar goes beyond the extremes of excusable conduct.
Maybe it was more understandable back in the day, when fish seemed
abundant and anglers were few. Today, according to the
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory at The University of Southern Mississippi,
which refers to information provided by the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature,
“There has been no formal stock assessment of tarpon in any
portion of the species’ range; however, multiple lines of evidence suggest that
populations of Atlantic tarpon appear to have declined from historic levels
throughout their range. This species is
currently listed as Vulnerable…”
Thus, there is reason to manage tarpon conservatively, with
the hope of ending any decline and perhaps rebuilding the population to
something closer to the historical norm.
In the Gulf, Florida, Texas
and Alabama
have already adopted moderately to extremely restrictive restrictions on
landings to help achieve such goals.
That’s a good thing, since tarpon are slow to mature and
live a long time. The Gulf Coast
Research Laboratory says that
“At seven to thirteen years of age, and a length of about 30
to 49 inches, tarpon become sexually mature and their growth rate slows…Tarpon
may live as long as 55 years.”
Fish with that sort of life history are particularly
vulnerable to excessive fishing effort, and when the population declines, are
particularly difficult to restore. One
can only wonder how old the big fish killed off Louisiana might have been, and how
killing such big females affects the health of the population.
It’s not hard to guess that the effect isn’t good.
And what’s killed off Louisiana matters to everyone, since
the laboratory also states that
“Tarpon are highly migratory…fish from Texas and elsewhere in
the Gulf commonly range as far as the Caribbean and the east coast of the U.S.
as far north as Virginia. Tarpon that
winter in Florida and Mexico regularly move along the northern Gulf of Mexico
coastline…during summer,”
The casual killing of tarpon off Louisiana, where even SCUBA divers are allowed to
poke holes in the big fish just for entertainment, isn’t merely distasteful;
it can contribute to declining tarpon stocks throughout the United States and
Central America.
However, it is, unfortunately, not the only place in this
country, let alone elsewhere, where that sort of waste takes place.
And tarpon aren’t the only victims.
All along the Atlantic seaboard, there are tournaments every
season which see fish, particularly sharks and marlin, weighed in at the scales
and then unceremoniously hauled off to a dumpster. Fortunately, such practices aren’t quite as
prevalent as they once were.
On the other hand, like tarpon, neither sharks nor marlin
are anywhere near as prevalent as they once were, either.
Maybe there is some connection…
Here on New York’s Long Island, we’ve lost winter flounder
and whiting (silver hake), along with most of our cod, tautog and
weakfish. Fishing for tuna is not what
it once was, and our inshore white marlin are gone. Atlantic mackerel no longer swarm up the
coast in the spring.
But after we saw striped bass collapse, and then saw fisheries
managers strive to rebuild them, anglers stood up and said “Not again!” when abundance
began to decline once again.
We’ve learned how easily fish stocks can decline,
and how hard it is to rebuild them.
Anglers on other shores can tell the same tales; only the names of the
fish will be different.
Thus, it is difficult to understand why fishermen will still
kill a tarpon, a marlin or anything else, just for a photo and some fleeting
fame.
After all of the problems we’ve seen with our fish stocks,
and after how hard we’ve struggled to rebuild just a few, you’d think that folks would
know better by now.
No comments:
Post a Comment