In what can only be called a surprising and somewhat strange
announcement, the
Bass Anglers’ Sportsman Society, better known as B.A.S.S.—the organization that
effectively created the freshwater bass tournament industry and turned a bunch
of once-laid-back folks in rowboats and runabouts into the most lucrative
marketing opportunity in outdoor sports—has announced that it is getting into
salt water fisheries politics.
On the surface, it doesn’t make sense.
B.A.S.S. tournaments are all about catching freshwater bass, and even then, white
bass and stripers need not apply.
B.A.S.S. fishermen are, well, bass fishermen; many don’t wander
too far from freshwater lakes and don’t fish for the fish that swim in the sea.
So just why would an organization focused on tournament
fishing for freshwater critters create Bass Anglers for Saltwater
Conservation?
When you read between the lines, the cause becomes clear,
and conservation has little to do with it.
Go to the web page, and you find B.A.S.S. members being
urged
“Tweet Congress to
support our right to fish!
“Join with Dean Rojas and countless other pro anglers in the
fight to defend our right to fish. By
sending this prewritten tweet to your Congressmen, you’re sending a message to
Washington D.C. that anglers will not be ignored. Join the fight today!”
A similar message goes on to tell all the B.A.S.S. members
that Mike Iaconelli, another tournament pro, wants them to contact their
Senators.
I’m not a B.A.S.S., member, and can’t access the preprinted
message, but it’s not hard to guess what it says, particularly after reading the
article in Trade Only Today, which is dominated by the Center for Coastal
Conservation’s President, Jeff Angers, gushing over the new B.A.S.S. effort,
saying things such as
“There are 13 million saltwater anglers, 31 million
freshwater anglers. We are much stronger
together.
“Whether you fish in salt water or fresh water, I encourage
you to visit BassforSalt.com today and speak out about the sport we love.”
And then Angers gets to the kicker.
“With Congress considering the Magnuson-Stevens Act—the
primary legislation affecting recreational fishing in federal waters—and with
Washington imposing unrealistic restrictions on fishing from the Carolinas to
Biscayne Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, it’s time that we as anglers make our
voices heard.”
I have to admit, it’s a masterful ploy. By invoking bass fishing celebrities such as
Dean Rojas and Mike Iaconelli, Angers—and the folks at B.A.S.S.—have a very
good chance of getting a bunch of star-struck anglers to take a stance on
marine resources issues that they know nothing about, just as a Lady Gaga or
similar celeb can work up junior high co-eds over some social cause.
On the other hand, it’s pretty strange, because B.A.S.S.
traditionally paid no attention to other species at all. Ray
Scott was the entrepreneur and visionary who gave birth to the organization,
and his biography, published on the website of Ray Scott Outdoors, notes that
“’[B.A.S.S. is] an exclusive club, dedicated to the black
bass only. ‘If you mess with musky or
piddle with perch, you don’t belong in B.A.S.S.’ was Scott’s message.”
So we can’t help but wonder was B.A.S.S. is suddenly getting
interested in salt water fish politics.
In addition, Scott himself quickly came to understand the
value of conservation. Although the very
first B.A.S.S. tournaments weighted in dead fish, that quickly changed for the
better. As his biography explains,
“Attending a Federation of Fly Fisherman’s conclave in
Colorado, Scott watched a fly-rodder catch a small 12-inch trout. Then later he experienced an awakening as he
watched the catch-and-release ceremony the angler and his fishing companions
observed in releasing the trout.
“It was then that Scott’s idea for ‘Don’t Kill Your Catch’
bass fishing tournaments was born. Among
Ray Scott’s many contributions his concept of catch-and-release may well be the
most lasting legacy. Today more than 98
percent of bass weighed-in during national B.A.S.S. tournaments return alive to
the waters and the release percentage is equally high among other fishing
groups, bass clubs and individual anglers.”
Given those facts, which are unquestionably true, it’s
difficult to comprehend why B.A.S.S. would take a national stand to weaken
federal fisheries laws so that irresponsibly high numbers of fish of all sorts
might be killed in the sea.
I know bass guides who regularly participate in bass tournaments,
and my wife and I once had the privilege of fishing, in upstate New York, with
a young guide who had national B.A.S.S. pro ambitions. Spending time with such folks, it doesn’t take long to get a
real feel for their connection to the resource. They would have scant tolerance
for anyone who suggested that laws should be eased so that people could kill
more freshwater bass than the science suggested, and put the health of even one
lake’s bass stock at risk.
For the catch-and-release culture is well-ingrained, not
only among B.A.S.S. folks, but among freshwater anglers as a whole, who gladly
fish under the sort of rational, science-based rules that the Center for
Coastal Conservation has always deplored.
So why is an organization with a heritage of conservation in
their home waters trying to oppose conservation at sea?
We can’t know for certain, because that’s something that
will never be told on its website.
Perhaps they just don’t understand what they’re
promoting. They might have been sold a
bill of goods by the Center folks, who painted their greed in red, white and
blue and framed it with photos of families and kids who were allegedly denied
access to the sea’s bounty.
Or perhaps—and this is my guess—we can look to the sponsors,
the boatbuilders and tackle folks who support the B.A.S.S. tournaments and TV
shows, who also belong to the trade groups that make up the Center. It’s not hard to imagine them using their
access to B.A.S.S. personnel and convincing them to help weaken the federal law for
the industry’s gain.
Whatever the reason, it is very unfortunate, for up until
now, B.A..S.S. and its founder have created a legacy of doing good things,
creating an economic powerhouse based on conservation and catch-and-release,
not on coolers and stringers filled with dead fish.
Bass Anglers for Saltwater Conservation isn’t about bass,
isn’t about B.A.S.S., and most certainly isn’t about conservation. It is merely a cynical effort that takes
advantage of B.A.S.S.’ good name and the good will of B.A.S.S. members, and
enlists them in a cause that is, at its heart, contrary to the organization’s
past efforts and, if those efforts can be any guide, its core standards as
well.
We can only hope that both B.A.S.S. and its members take another
look at the program, and realize just how wrong it is.
Wow! Somebody is bitter.
ReplyDeleteBitter? Seems like a pretty rational argument to me. Without a doubt HR 1335 is an effort to weaken the conservation provisions in fed law (read kill more fish). So why on earth would an org that promotes C&R fishing support it?
ReplyDelete