Today was the last day that the National Marine Fisheries
Service accepted comments on a proposed Exempted Fishing Permit that would
allow Mississippi charter and party boats to harvest red drum out in federal
waters over the next couple of years.
I mentioned the proposal a couple of weeks ago, and I hope
that some folks registered their opposition, because if this idea flies in the
Gulf, it won’t be long before someone tries to get the same sort of permit here
on the East Coast, in order to target striped bass in our federal waters, where
the harvest is currently closed.
Red drum and striped bass are equally treasured by anglers
in the waters where each species is found, so I completely understand why folks
in the Gulf might want to keep the federal waters shut down. Even so, I had to scratch my head in a bit of
puzzlement when I read something on the Coastal Conservation Association’s
website just a few days ago.
The headline was certainly catchy.
And if you start reading the meat of the message, they make
those “Feds” sound pretty bad.
“Exempted Fishing Permit targeting breeder red drum sets
stage for fish grab
“The federal government’s management of Gulf fisheries has
created some of the most chaotic, dysfunctional and unsatisfactory fisheries in
the country, and now it seems that the agency is set on bringing that same
experience to our red drum fishery in the Gulf of Mexico.
“NOAA Fisheries is currently seeking comment on a two-year
plan to allow harvest of breeding-sized red drum in federal waters for the
first time in decades…”
“Anyone who has watched the manipulation of the red snapper
fishery the past few years should be extremely alarmed at the implications of
this federal overreach into one of the great state-based marine conservation
victories. The EFP is limited to
Mississippi’s for-hire industry today, but it is certain to spread rapidly to other states if it is
approved. [emphasis in the original]”
Reading CCA’s diatribe against NMFS would make anyone
believe that federal fisheries managers were out to steal red drum out from
under Gulf anglers’ noses by opening a for-hire fishery in waters that are
closed to everyone else.
The only problem is, that isn’t not quite true.
The
item in the Federal Register which announced the proposed rulemaking, clearly
states that
“an application for an exempted fishing permit (EFP) [has
been received] from the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources…”
So there’s no doubt that the impetus for letting for-hire
boats sample red drum in the Gulf’s federal waters came not from NMFS, but from
the State of Mississippi. Yes, the State
of Mississippi. The STATE
FISHERIES MANAGERS of Mississippi…
And CCA actually knows this, because in their comments to NMFS opposing
the proposed exempted fishing permits, they start right off saying
“The Coastal Conservation Association is opposed to the
exempted fishing permit (EFP) application filed by the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources… [emphasis added]”
And that makes you wonder about a few things.
First, it makes you wonder why CCA, in their release to the public,
went so out of their way to criticize federal managers, in a manner likely
to make folks believe that allowing the Mississippi for-hires to kill red drum
offshore was the federal managers’ idea.
I’d never be surprised to see a press release worded like that come
out of southern New Jersey, but I always believed that the folks down in
Houston would try quite a bit harder to avoid misleading language.
But beyond that, it makes you wonder why CCA is so
vehemently opposed to the proposal.
After all, throughout the red snapper debate, we have seen
them, along with their partners in the Center for Coastal Conservation,
repeatedly write such things as
and
and
In fact, CCA and the rest of the folks at the Center are so
enamored of state fisheries managers that they want to strip all authority for
managing red snapper away from NMFS, and give it to state authorities. According
to the Center’s President, Jeff Angers,
But now that the fisheries managers of the State
of Mississippi want to let their for-hire boats fish for offshore red drum, it
seems that CCA might be questioning their wisdom after all. In fact, CCA seems to be doubting the wisdom
of all the states’ fishery managers, as it expresses its fear that “other
states” will “rapidly” emulate Mississippi if its exempted fisheries permit is
granted.
CCA is effectively asking NMFS for help in keeping the red
drum safe from what the states want to do.
Now, this creates a conundrum. Why do CCA and the rest of their Center
colleagues believe that the states are wise enough to manage red snapper better
than the feds already do, but fear the states’ gaining some control over red
drum in federal waters?
One would think, given all of the praise that such folks had
for state managers during the red snapper debate, that they’d support lifting
the federal red drum closure completely, and letting the states have full
management authority for red drum, as well as red snapper.
It appears that the folks over at CCA are now trapped by their own
rhetoric. In the case of red snapper, they’re
not happy with science-based federal management, because it doesn’t allow them
to kill as many fish as they’d like; thus, they rhapsodize over state fisheries
managers that would permit a higher, if perhaps unsustainable, harvest.
But when it comes to red drum, perhaps the most revered
sport fish along the Gulf Coast, they’re very happy with federal protections
that guard the drum brood stock against state harvest excesses. So they’re trying to blame the feds for
taking comments on the exempted fishing permit for red drum, while conveniently
ignoring the fact that it was the State of Mississippi that is spearheading the
effort.
CCA warns that NMFS must deny Mississippi an exempted
fishing permit for red drum in order to
at the hands of that state and the others which would “rapidly”
follow suit. However, it offers no
explanation as to why the red snapper fishery wouldn’t meet a similar fate if
it lost its federal protections.
And that makes no sense, because what is good for red
snapper should be good for red drum, and what is bad for red drum isn’t likely
to red snapper a lot of good, either.
Seems unfair to me they would only allow those aboard a Charter boat keep Bull Reds, why not allow Fishermen with their own boats to catch them?
ReplyDeleteTx the HOME of CCA allows the harvest of a BREEDER red fish 365 days a year out to 9 miles so other states can't? Hypocrite is the word I use and the author points out in a consistent manner.
ReplyDelete